Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A study of the physical conditions of libraries and the behavior of their users was conducted in four high school libraries in Israel. The research questions were: (a) What is the connection between the physical conditions in the library and the concentrations of students in it and the choice of seating location? and (b) What characteristics of territorial behavior are connected to the physical layout of the library? Data collection included observation of 1,222 students, interviews with all the staff of the libraries and with 20 students, and completion of 394 questionnaires by students while they were in the library. Over half of the students who were observed in the libraries chose to sit in the area of the reading tables, and 17% settled in the armchair area. Special attention was paid to the first 15 students who entered each library on each observation day because they had maximum choice in their selection of seating. Of the 170 students who were first to enter a library, close to two thirds chose to sit in a central location exposed to neighbors and passersby, and about one third chose tables in the corners of the library.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it