MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994008770 · doi:10.14288/1.0375953

Improving the quality of crop residues by the reduction of ash content and inorganic constituents

2019· article· en· W2994008770 on OpenAlex
Yige Peng

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCoal and Coke Industries Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceChemistryCropAgronomyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fuel pellet producers in Canada have started to consider alternative feedstocks that include agricultural crop residues. Yet, the higher ash content and inorganic constituents of crop residues can impose problems on the equipment, the quality of products, and the environment due to air emission. In this study, mechanical size fractionation in combination with leaching was conducted to improve the quality of crop residues by reducing the ash content to target value of 6% db following the applicable standard. Experimental results of mechanical size fractionation suggest that the finest fraction of ground crop residues had much higher ash contents than the coarser fractions. Results also indicate that size fractionation can reduce the need for leaching as ash removal technique, and it is most effective for corn stover when compared to canola straw and wheat straw. For the leaching tests, the leaching performance is affected by the leaching conditions whereas particle size can have some impact. Under the same leaching conditions, non-fractionated ground crop residues with larger average particle size had higher ash removal efficiency than the finest fraction of crop residues. Among the three species of crop residues, canola straw was found to have the best leaching performance, regardless of whether mechanical size fractionation was used prior to leaching. Canola straw had the highest ash removal efficiencies, K₂O removal efficiency (greater than 90%) and SiO₂ removal efficiency (more than 50%). The results also demonstrate that the effect of leaching temperature on K₂O removal efficiency is negligible while SiO₂ removal efficiency increases significantly as water temperature increases from 25 to 45 °C upon leaching for 12 h. A preliminary cost analysis was performed to estimate the total production cost (TPC) of agro-pellets based on different process designs with respect to the ash removal techniques. TPC for the base case of pellet production without ash removal pretreatment was estimated to be US$102/dry tonne (dt) pellets, and it would increase by 30% to US$133/dt for Option 1 (pretreatment by mechanical size fraction plus water leaching) and increase by 66% to US$169/dt for Option 2 (pretreatment by water leaching only).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.850

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it