MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994108433

The use of environmental noise standards and guidelines in Canada

2006· article· en· W2994108433 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Bill Gastmeier

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsBGC Engineering (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise (video)Context (archaeology)Environmental noiseEnvironmental standardEngineeringNoise exposureComputer scienceAcousticsSound (geography)GeographyPhysicsPolitical scienceLawArchaeologyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A summary of the environmental noise standards and guidelines that are currently in use in Canada is described. The Canadian Standards Association (CSA) administers a number of standards dealing directly with environmental noise. There is an ongoing activity to endorse or adopt the standards prepared by other organizations for use in Canadian context. Input was received from members of the environmental Noise Subcommittee of the Z107 Technical committee of the CSA. The environmental noise standards that are currently in use include CAN/CSA- ISO 1996-1, CAN/CSA- ISO 1996-2, CAN/CSA- ISO 1996-3, CAN/CSA-Z107.55-M86, ISO 9631-1, ISO 9631-2, ISO-4872, and SAE J1096. The ISO 2922 standard is related to the measurement of noise emitted by vessels on island waterway and harbors. The CAN3-Z107.54-M85 (R1993) standard is related to the procedure for the measurement of sound and vibration due to blasting operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.015
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207