MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994115159

The Background and Theoretical Origin of Ecofeminism

2014· article· en· W2994115159 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ling Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcofeminismRomanticismFeminismAnthropocentrismSociologyRomanceEnvironmentalismRationalismEssentialismEnvironmental ethicsEpistemologyEcologyGender studiesPhilosophyPolitical scienceHistoryPsychologyBiologyPsychoanalysisArt historyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article observes the practical and theoretical background of Ecofeminism to explore its origin in the theory of romanticism. The study finds that, as a social movement and social trend of thought, Ecofeminism is a combined product of the women’s liberation movement and the ecological protection movement. The two movements are designed to develop a non-anthropocentric worldview and behavior, opposing dualistic cultural traditions of rationalism. There is no doubt that this call of “back to nature” has shown a strong romantic color. As the latest progression in feminist theory, Ecofeminism is an ecology-oriented feminism and its theory is inseparable from the nourishment of romanticism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureFrench-language works237,207