MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994192791

Techniques for using ray tracing for complicated spaces

2001· article· en· W2994192791 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Alex Boudreau, A. L’Espérance

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRay tracing (physics)ComputationTracingComputer scienceNoise (video)Noise reductionReduction (mathematics)Representation (politics)Field (mathematics)Identification (biology)Noise controlAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the last decade, the ray tracing method has contributed considerably to improve the prediction accu racy of acoustic room modelling.Ray tracing methods allow the analysis of complicated sound field for any room.However, the use of these methods and their validation are not always trivial.Even so, right and use ful modelling is obtained only when each construction stage of the model is well done.The objective of this paper is to present, through a complicated example (a hydroelectric power station), some original techniques of modelling and validation.The identification of noise sources and the determination of their acoustic power, the representation of a non-single point source, the validation and some modelling techniques meant to reduce time computation will be presented.Furthermore, an efficient method for the evaluation of noise reduction provided by the various treatments will also be shown.This method, based on an evaluation of transfer functions between noise sources and different computation points in the room, can be used to choose the best acoustic treatment for a given noise reduction objective.All techniques presented in this paper have been applied and validated on an industrial case. SOMMAIREDurant la dernire dcennie, la mthode du tir de rayon a contribu amliorer considrablement la qualit des prdictions en acoustique prvisionnelle.Cette mthode permet l'analyse du champ sonore de btiments complexes partir de modles gomtriques.Les mthodes d'laboration et de validation de ces modles ne sont cependant pas toujours triviales.Pourtant, c'est la qualit de ces mthodes qui rend possible l'ob tention d'un modle juste et utile.L'objectif de cet article est de prsenter, l'aide d'un exemple de mod lisation complexe (une centrale hydrolectrique), des techniques originales de modlisation et de valida tion.La dtermination des sources de bruit et de leur puissance acoustique, la reprsentation des sources non ponctuelles, la validation et les diffrentes techniques de modlisation pour rduire les temps de calcul seront prsentes.De plus, une mthode permettant d'valuer de faon efficace les rductions de bruit apportes par les diffrents traitements envisags sera expose.Cette mthode, base sur l'valuation des fonctions de transfert entre les sources de bruit et les diffrents points de calcul du btiment, permet de choisir le traitement le plus performant en fonction des objectifs de rduction.Toutes les techniques prsen tes dans cet article ont t appliques et valides sur un cas industriel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207