MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994203201

A River Runs Through It: The Future of the Columbia River Treaty, Water Rights, Development, and Climate Change

2013· article· en· W2994203201 on OpenAlexaffabout
Scott O. McKenzie

Bibliographic record

VenueGeorgia State University law review · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransboundary Water Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydropowerTreatyDrainage basinWater resourcesStructural basinClimate changeFlood controlWater resource managementFlood mythNegotiationIrrigationEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Environmental planningGeographyPolitical scienceEngineeringGeologyEcologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Columbia River Treaty (Treaty) has served successfully as an instrument for flood control and hydropower in the Columbia River Basin (Basin) since 1961. Today, different uses such as restoring fish populations, agricultural irrigation, and providing drinking water demand a share of the Basin’s shrinking water supply. As early as 2014, negotiations for the next Treaty can begin. The United States and Canada will need to update the instrument and transition from a focus on disaster mitigation and electrical production to a flexible basin-wide, transboundary water-management organization that can dynamically balance new goals for the use of the Basin’s water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeorgia State University law reviewSame topicTransboundary Water Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207