Problems and Countermeasures of the Groundwater Resource Protection Legislation in China
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the intensified development and utilization of groundwater resources, the pollution has become increasingly serious than before. However, many deficiencies still exist in China’s groundwater resource protection legislation. Based on the legal protection status of China’s groundwater resources, this article analyzes the problems in the legislation, which include The existing laws and regulations are not systematic, legal system requires to be improved, protection of groundwater resources in rural areas is absent, management system requires to be improved, Scientific and reasonable legal provisions on legal liability are absent, and awareness of protecting groundwater resources needs to be improved. In the end, the author proposes corresponding suggestions for progress: Improve the legal system to protect groundwater resources, develop the scientific and effective legal measures, strengthen the protection of groundwater resources in rural areas, clarify the regulatory responsibilities on groundwater resources, set up strict legal liabilities, and increase incentives to improve the awareness to protect groundwater resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it