MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994251053

Application of mixture design for compound microbial inoculants in straw degradation.

2009· article· en· W2994251053 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rui Liu, Ni GuangYuan, Chuyun Wan, Qian Huang, Fenghong Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueZhongguo shengwu gongcheng zazhi · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobial inoculantStrawCelluloseSugarBagasseBacillus licheniformisBacillus subtilisFood scienceChemistryPulp and paper industryMicroorganismLigninDegradation (telecommunications)BiologyBacteriaOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crops straw contains large quantities of lignocelluloses that have stable structure and hardly degraded.Apply mixture design to study different mixtures of five strains that can degrade lignocelluloses.Regression model on microorganism composition and degrading rate of lignocelluloses and content of reducing sugar was established.The predictable degrading rate of cellulose reached 35.75%.The maxim predictable degrading rate of lignin was 27% and the most predictable production of reducing sugar was 3.39mg/g.Based on these response values satisfied all expectation were optimized,and the most excellent combinations of Bacillus Subtilis,Bacillus Licheniformis,Canadian krusei,Trametes versicolor,Phaerochaete chrysosporium were 12.1%,10%,27.2%,10.6%,and 40%,respectively.Three indicators of the measured values were 35.47%,26.41% and 2.37mg/g.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhongguo shengwu gongcheng zazhiSame topicBiofuel production and bioconversionFrench-language works237,207