MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994288578

Highlights of Corporate Governance Research: Studies Examine Post-SOX Issues, CEO Pay, Whistleblowing

2011· article· en· W2994288578 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cynthia Bolt-Lee, David Farber, Stephen R. Moehrle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancy · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicRisk Management in Financial Firms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccountingCorporate governanceAuditBusinessAudit committeeLegislationInternal controlExternal auditorSarbanes–Oxley ActControl environmentControl (management)Internal auditFinanceJoint auditEconomicsPolitical scienceManagementLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several corporate governance developments have occurred in the wake of the high-profile scandals of the past decade. Some of these developments are motivated by legislation such as the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002 (SOX). Others are best practices enhancements intended to shore up investor confidence. Academic research has monitored these developments. This article summarizes important academic findings and observations recently published in prominent accounting and finance journals. IMPROVE INTERNAL CONTROL BY HIRING AN ACCOUNTING-SAVVY CFO The main goal of SOX was to restore investor confidence in financial reporting. Consistent with this goal, SOX section 404 requires companies and auditors to assess the effectiveness of internal controls. Because adverse 404 opinions have negative implications for company value, understanding how companies can prevent and fix conditions related to weak internal controls over financial reporting is important to understand. Authors Chan Li, Lili Sun and Michael Ettredge studied the relationship between both CFO turnover and professional qualifications with adverse 404 opinions and the correction of internal control weaknesses. CFOs play a central role in the control environment, and the authors argue that CFOs with more accounting knowledge--either as a CPA or with audit firm experience should better understand internal controls and therefore be in a position to correct control deficiencies. The authors used a sample of 2,478 companies that disclosed auditors' initial SOX 404 opinions m 2005, including 416 companies with adverse opinions. The authors' main findings were that companies with adverse opinions: (1) had CFOs with weaker accounting qualifications; (2) were more likely to fire their CFOs; (3) were more likely to hire new CFOs with better accounting knowledge; and (4) were more likely to receive better SOX 404 opinions after hiring new CFOs who had more accounting knowledge. The study Qualifications, Financial Turnover, and Adverse 404 Opinions was published in May 2010 in the Journal of Accounting and Economics. COMPENSATION CONSULTANT BIAS Large corporations often hire executive compensation consultants to provide objectivity in determining executive salaries. But if these consultants are also paid for consulting in areas of the company, is their objectivity diminished? Additionally, are they more objective when they are hired by the board's compensation committee rather than management? Results of a research study titled Executive Pay and 'Independent' Compensation Consultants, published in the April 2010 edition of the Journal of Accounting and Economics, suggest that compensation consultants tend to lose their independence when they provide both compensation- and noncompensation-related to their corporate clients. Over the past decade, due to the potential for conflicts of interest, the SEC began requiring disclosures regarding executive compensation consulting arrangements including total fees paid and to whom the consultant reports (that is, management or independent compensation committee members). Authors Kevin J. Murphy and Tatiana Sandino sampled regulatory filings for more than 1,000 U.S. companies in 2006, the first year of the required disclosure. The study also included more than 100 Canadian companies, which have compensation disclosure requirements that are similar to those in the U.S. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] The authors' research examined two main questions. First, did CEOs receive larger salaries if their compensation consultant provided than the compensation study? Second, was the CEO paid more when management had significant influence over the decision to reappoint or not reappoint the consultant in the future? Results revealed that compensation increases for CEOs in the United States and Canada were 18% and 33% greater, respectively, when compensation consultants provided other services compared with compensation increases where the consultants did not provide services. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.010
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.205
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancySame topicRisk Management in Financial FirmsFrench-language works237,207