MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2994382439 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.190678

The Soluble Isoform of CTLA-4 Correlates with Interferon-α Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

2019· letter· en· W2994382439 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lekh N. Dahal, Robert N. Barker, Frank J. Ward

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilVersus ArthritisUniversity of Aberdeen
KeywordsImmunologyAutoantibodyAntibodyAntigenImmune systemMedicineAutoimmune diseaseSystemic lupus erythematosusDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem autoimmune disorder characterized by fluctuating levels of immune response hyperactivity, high serum titers of nucleic antigen-specific autoantibodies, and persistent production of type-I interferon (IFN)1. One route to controlling SLE has been to exploit the properties of T cell lymphocyte costimulation inhibitor (CTLA-4), a selective costimulation inhibitor, which suppresses auto-antigen-specific T cell response intensity2. Although the full-length cell-surface receptor CTLA-4 is well characterized, other alternatively spliced isoforms exist, including a soluble form of the molecule (sCTLA-4)3. Initial analysis of sCTLA-4 in patients with SLE described raised serum levels compared with healthy donors, and sCTLA-4 levels correlated with disease activity4, but little is known of whether it plays any role in SLE. Currently, this is a relevant question because there is anecdotal evidence that CTLA4-Ig can have clinical benefits for some patients with SLE5. Studies of sCTLA-4 using current anti–CTLA-4 antibodies should be interpreted with caution because they are raised against the extracellular region, found in the receptor, cleaved receptor artifact and the soluble isoform, hence obscuring the contribution of native sCTLA-4. Here, using antibodies raised specifically against native sCTLA-46,7, we determined whether sCTLA-4 contributes to the immune response underlying SLE, particularly regarding SLE markers IFN-α and anti-dsDNA antibody levels. The study included 104 patients with SLE and 40 healthy volunteer donors and first compared serum levels of IFN-α (Figure 1). All methods were carried out in accordance with the Grampian … Address correspondence to F.J. Ward, University of Aberdeen, Immunity, Infection and Inflammation group, Division of Applied Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK. E-mail: mmd475{at}abdn.ac.uk or L.N. Dahal, L.N.Dahal{at}liverpool.ac.uk

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicT-cell and B-cell Immunology→French-language works237,207→