Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using the controversial 1970 Miss Canadian University pageant as a case study, this Research Note contextualizes young women’s participation in and rejection of pageants within the burgeoning women’s liberation movement on Canadian university campuses in the 1960s and 1970s. Through an analysis of archival records, it examines how the issues raised and actions taken in the 1970 pageant and protest percolated across university campuses, raising awareness of the women’s liberation movement among university students while enhancing student activism. It also focuses specifically on the impact that the protests had on the counterculture campus of Simon Fraser University and the more conservative student body at Waterloo Lutheran University. Abstract: Le controversé concours Miss Canadian University de 1970 sert d’étude de cas dans la présente note de recherche pour étudier la participation de jeunes femmes à des concours de beauté et leur rejet de tels concours dans le contexte du mouvement de libération de la femme, en plein essor sur les campus universitaires du Canada dans les années 1960 et 1970. Les documents d’archives montrent que les questions soulevées et les mesures prises au concours de 1970 se sont répercutées sur les campus, ont sensibilisé les étudiants au mouvement de libération de la femme et renforcé le militantisme étudiant. La note se penche en particulier sur les effets des contestations à l’Université Simon Fraser, haut lieu de la contre-culture, et sur les étudiants plutôt conservateurs de la Waterloo Lutheran University.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.052 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".