MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994451878 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-131521

Alpha-Dystroglycan Supports Platelet Aggregation and Thrombus Formation

2019· article· en· W2994451878 on OpenAlexaff
Yiming Wang, Reid C. Gallant, Miguel A. D. Neves, Xi Lei, Sahil Gupta, Rodrigo Coelho, Tatianna Wai Ying Wong, Ronald D. Cohn, Kevin P. Campbell, Heyu Ni

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood properties and coagulation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Blood ServicesUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlateletIntegrinPlatelet membrane glycoproteinFibronectinMolecular biologyVon Willebrand factorChemistryPlatelet activationCell biologyLamininDystrophinDuchenne muscular dystrophyExtracellular matrixBiologyImmunologyBiochemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Fibrinogen (Fg) and von Willebrand factor (VWF) have been considered essential for platelet adhesion and aggregation. However, platelet aggregation still occurs in mice lacking Fg and/or VWF or plasma fibronectin but not β3 integrin (JCI, 2000; JTH, 2006; Blood, 2009; JCI, 2014). This suggests that other non-classical αIIbβ3 integrin ligand(s) mediate platelet aggregation. α-dystroglycan (α-DG) is a component of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex that binds extracellular matrix proteins containing laminin-G like domains via unique heteropolysaccharide [-GlcA-β1,3-Xyl-α1,3-]n called matriglycan, which can be targeted specifically with monoclonal antibody IIH6C4. Although α-DG was identified in a recent proteomic study of platelet releasate, its membrane expression and function in platelets have never been investigated. Methods and Results: Using the anti-α-DG monoclonal antibody IIH6C4, we found expression of α-DG in mouse and human resting platelets in Western blots. α-DG expression was also identified on the non-permeabilized mouse and human resting platelets by flow cytometry, indicating that α-DG is constitutively expressed on the platelet surface. We next examined whether disruption of the integrity of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex affects the platelet aggregation. In a dystrophin-deficient mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy with reduced α-DG expression (mdx mice), we found that ADP induced platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) decreased 50%, suggesting that the integrity of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex is required for normal platelet aggregation. To test whether inhibition of platelet aggregation can be achieved by targeting α-DG, we applied the well-established polyclonal (H300) and monoclonal (IIH6C4 and VIA4) anti-α-DG antibodies. Mouse gel-filtered platelet aggregation induced by thrombin was significantly inhibited by all three antibodies. Mouse platelet aggregation in PRP was also inhibited by H300. For platelets from healthy human donors, the inhibitive effect was more profound. Using a lower concentration of H300 (1 µg/mL in human vs. 2 µg/mL in mouse), ADP induced human platelet aggregation in PRP was inhibited to less than 50% of control and quickly de-aggregated within 5 minutes, while no de-aggregation was observed in the controls. Human gel-filtered platelet aggregation was also inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by these antibodies. Our results thus revealed a vital role of α-DG in platelet aggregation. In an ex vivo perfusion chamber model, human platelet adhesion and thrombus formation on collagen were markedly decreased at an arterial shear rate of 1800/s by anti-α-DG antibodies. Interestingly, although α-DG was found to be a ligand of laminin, platelet adhesion on laminin was not significantly altered by these antibodies, suggesting that contribution of α-DG to thrombus formation is not through its classical ligand laminin but other previously unidentified mechanisms. Next, we tested the role of α-DG in thrombus formation in vivo. Using a mouse cremaster artery laser-injury intravital microscopy model, we found that the anti-α-DG antibodies significantly delayed and decreased thrombus formation. To investigate the underlying mechanism of the surprisingly profound impact of α-DG on platelet aggregation and thrombus formation, we performed the co-immunoprecipitation assay and found that α-DG interacts with both β3 integrin and fibronectin, even in the absence of Fg and VWF, suggesting that α-DG may directly or form an α-DG-fibronectin complex to bind αIIbβ3 integrin, contributing to platelet aggregation and thrombus formation. Conclusion: Our data demonstrated that α-DG and likely other components of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex are expressed on the platelet surface, and play a vital role in platelet aggregation and thrombus formation. α-DG may contribute to platelet aggregation independent of VWF and Fg through direct or indirect interaction with αIIbβ3 integrin. It is likely that patients with muscular dystrophies, such as those with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, are protected from thrombosis. More importantly, our data established α-DG, and potentially other components of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex, as novel targets for the treatment of thrombotic disorders. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicBlood properties and coagulationFrench-language works237,207