MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994527227 · doi:10.1109/icems.2019.8922333

Improved Stator Current Vector Determination Considering Harmonic Iron Loss for Maximum Efficiency Control of PMSM in EV Applications

2019· article· en· W2994527227 on OpenAlexaff
Aiswarya Balamurali, Animesh Kundu, Ze Li, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatorHarmonicsControl theory (sociology)HarmonicInverterVector controlHarmonic analysisSynchronous motorPulse-width modulationTraction (geology)Traction motorComputer scienceEngineeringAutomotive engineeringInduction motorElectronic engineeringVoltagePhysicsElectrical engineeringControl (management)AcousticsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate and comprehensive control of interior permanent magnet synchronous machine (IPMSM) over a wide speed and load range is of paramount importance for a superior performance of the traction motor and its drive in electric vehicles. Many control methods such as loss minimization and maximum efficiency considering motor and inverter controllable losses have been developed in literature to improve the efficiency of the motor - drive. Stator harmonic iron losses contribute to a significant amount of controllable electrical losses in PMSM. In this paper, a novel dq-axis based harmonic iron loss model has been initially developed to consider the harmonic iron losses due to time harmonics from a sine pulse width modulated inverter. Subsequently, the model has been used in an offline procedure towards determining optimal current advance angle for improving the efficiency of an IPMSM. The improved PMSM loss model and subsequently, the analytical efficiency models have been derived by considering the varying motor parameters. The accuracy of the developed harmonic iron loss model has been validated using numerical simulations and experimental investigations on a laboratory 4.25 kW scaled- down traction IPMSM. The effectiveness of the control method using the improved model in increasing the efficiency has also been validated experimentally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207