The Degree of Using Alternative Assessment Strategies by the Teachers of the First Three Grades in the Tabuk Region: Survey Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main aim of this study is to find out the degree of employment of alternative assessment strategies in the first three grades’ teachers at schools in Tabuk region. The sample of the study includes (75 male teachers and 95 female teachers) the total number of the sample is 165 subjects. The instrument of the study was developed based on the alternative assessment strategies. The psychometric characteristics of the instrument of the studies were determined. The results of the study showed that the most often used strategy by teachers is the paper and pencil strategy. Then the strategy of self-correction. The least used strategy is the observation strategy. The study also showed that female and male teacher’s estimation of the degree of employment was in general about average/in the middle. This study showed that there were no significant differences in the degree of employment of alternative assessment strategies among the first three grades’ teachers due to gender or experience. Nevertheless, there are significant differences in the degree of employment of the strategy of performance, paper and pencil and communication strategies due to the grade of the students. The study recommended conducting further studies on alternative assessments studies
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".