Superposition method for modelling boundaries between media in viscoelastic finite difference time domain simulations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Finite-difference time domain (FDTD) techniques are widely used to model the propagation of viscoelastic waves through complex and heterogeneous structures. However, in the specific case of media mixing liquid and solid, attempts to model continuous media onto a Cartesian grid produces errors when the liquid-solid interface between different media do not align precisely with the Cartesian grid. The increase in spatial resolution required to eliminate this grid staircasing effect can be computationally prohibitive. Here, a modification to the Virieux staggered-grid FDTD scheme called the superposition method is presented. This method is intended to reduce this staircasing effect while keeping a manageable computational time. The method was validated by comparing low-spatial-resolution simulations against simulations with sufficiently high resolution to provide reasonably accurate results at any incident angle. The comparison of the root-mean-square of the stress amplitude maps showed that the amplitude of artifactual waves could be reduced by several orders of magnitude when compared to the Virieux staggered-grid FDTD method and that the superposition method helped to significantly reduce the staircasing effect in FDTD simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".