Sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the mitochondrial genome for a giant clam commensal shrimp <i>Anchistus australis</i> (Decapoda: Caridea: Palaemonidae)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The shrimp Anchistus australis was a giant clam commensal species. Here, we explored in detail its mitochondrial (mt) genome, which was 15,396 bp in length, containing 13 protein-coding genes, 2 ribosomal RNA genes, 21 transfer RNA genes, and a non-coding control region 429 bp in length. The overall mt genome organization of A. australis displayed the typical characters for the pancrustacean ground pattern, with exception of translocation of trnW and trnL1, as well as deletion of trnL2. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed its evolutionary relatedness to other shrimp of family Palaemonidae within Infraorder Caridea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it