MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Apocalyptic Literature in the Global Imagination

2019· other· en· W2994651357 on OpenAlexaff
Lorenzo DiTommaso

Bibliographic record

VenueA Companion to World Literature · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMormonism, Religion, and History
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcellenceVirtueAudience measurementContext (archaeology)LiteratureInclusion (mineral)Content (measure theory)AestheticsHistorySociologyArtEpistemologyPhilosophySocial sciencePolitical scienceArchaeologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Apocalyptic literature is seldom discussed in the context of world literature, and apocalyptic writings are rarely, if ever considered part of its content. This is surprising, since apocalyptic literature is able to cross linguistic, social, and cultural boundaries with ease, while several premodern apocalyptic texts and perhaps twice as many modern ones merit inclusion in the canon. Some apocalyptic works are admitted because of their cultural influence and global readership. Others qualify as world literature by virtue of their literary excellence and ability to speak to the human condition in a way that transcends their original social and cultural contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueA Companion to World LiteratureSame topicMormonism, Religion, and HistoryFrench-language works237,207