A Hybrid Latent Space Data Fusion Method for Multimodal Emotion Recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multimodal emotion recognition is an emerging interdisciplinary field of research in the area of affective computing and sentiment analysis. It aims at exploiting the information carried by signals of different nature to make emotion recognition systems more accurate. This is achieved by employing a powerful multimodal fusion method. In this study, a hybrid multimodal data fusion method is proposed in which the audio and visual modalities are fused using a latent space linear map and then, their projected features into the cross-modal space are fused with the textual modality using a Dempster-Shafer (DS) theory-based evidential fusion method. The evaluation of the proposed method on the videos of the DEAP dataset shows its superiority over both decision-level and non-latent space fusion methods. Furthermore, the results reveal that employing Marginal Fisher Analysis (MFA) for feature-level audio-visual fusion results in higher improvement in comparison to cross-modal factor analysis (CFA) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA). Also, the implementation results show that exploiting textual users' comments with the audiovisual content of movies improves the performance of the system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".