MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994791734 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2019-0022

The effect of external magnetic field on the coherent to Compton scattering differential cross section ratios of elements in the range 20 ≤ <i>Z</i> ≤ 32

2019· article· en· W2994791734 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicRadiation Shielding Materials Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCompton scatteringScattering cross-sectionPhotonCross section (physics)Magnetic fieldRange (aeronautics)Field (mathematics)Differential (mechanical device)Atomic physicsNuclear physicsScatteringOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The coherent to Compton differential cross section ratios were calculated for elements in the range 20 ≤ Z ≤ 32 under an external magnetic field. The elements were irradiated by 59.54 keV gamma rays from an 241 Am radioactive source. A Si(Li) detector was used to detect the scattered photons. It was observed that the coherent to Compton differential cross section ratios of the samples increase with the magnetic field (B = 0, 0.4, and 0.8 T). The theoretical results were obtained with two different methods and compared with the experimental results at 0 T.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it