MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994794817 · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.052704

Single and multiple electron removal processes in proton–water-molecule collisions

2012· article· en· W2994794817 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsFragmentation (computing)IonizationElectronElectron captureIonFormalism (music)MoleculeProtonElectron ionizationRange (aeronautics)Charged particleNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Charge-state correlated cross sections for single- and multiple-electron removal processes (capture and ionization) in proton-H${}_{2}$O collisions are calculated by using the nonperturbative basis generator method adapted for ion-molecule collisions [Phys. Rev. A 80, 060702(R) (2009)]. The results are compared with experimental data for a wide range of impact energies spanning from 20 keV to several MeV. Single-electron removal probabilities in each molecular orbital are evaluated using the inclusive-probability formalism to predict the yields of charged fragments (H${}_{2}$O${}^{+}$, OH${}^{+}$, H${}^{+}$, O${}^{+}$) according to branching ratios that are valid at high impact energies. At intermediate and low energies, we calculate improved fragmentation cross sections that include the effects of multiple-electron removal processes. The resulting fragmentation yields agree with experiments at the 20$%$--30$%$ level even below 100 keV impact energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it