MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994838019 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3525

The lifecycle of molecular clouds in nearby star-forming disc galaxies

2019· article· en· W2994838019 on OpenAlexafffund
Mélanie Chevance, J. M. Diederik Kruijssen, A. P. S. Hygate, Andreas Schruba, Steven N. Longmore, Brent Groves, Jonathan D. Henshaw, Cinthya N. Herrera, Annie Hughes, Sarah Jeffreson, P. Lang, Adam K. Leroy, Sharon E. Meidt, J. Pety, Alessandro Razza, Erik Rosolowsky, Eva Schinnerer, Frank Bigiel, Guillermo A. Blanc, Éric Emsellem, Christopher M. Faesi, Simon C. O. Glover, Daniel T Haydon, I-Ting Ho, Kathryn Kreckel, Janice Lee, Daizhong Liu, Miguel Querejeta, Toshiki Saito, Jiayi Sun, A. Usero, Dyas Utomo

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Científico y TecnológicoAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónInstitut national des sciences de l'UniversNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAustralian Research CouncilKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteNational Science CouncilInternational Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems EngineeringCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCalifornia Earthquake AuthorityCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesMax-Planck-GesellschaftMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadFederación Española de Enfermedades RarasCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesCalifornia Department of Fish and GameNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanNational Institutes of Natural SciencesUniversität HeidelbergNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryH2020 European Research CouncilDeutscher Akademischer AustauschdienstEuropean CommissionDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftInternational Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular MicrobiologyNational Science FoundationEuropean Space AgencyMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilHorizon 2020 Framework Programme
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsStar formationGalaxyMolecular cloudStarsTimelineAstronomyGalaxy formation and evolution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT It remains a major challenge to derive a theory of cloud-scale ($\lesssim100$ pc) star formation and feedback, describing how galaxies convert gas into stars as a function of the galactic environment. Progress has been hampered by a lack of robust empirical constraints on the giant molecular cloud (GMC) lifecycle. We address this problem by systematically applying a new statistical method for measuring the evolutionary timeline of the GMC lifecycle, star formation, and feedback to a sample of nine nearby disc galaxies, observed as part of the PHANGS-ALMA survey. We measure the spatially resolved (∼100 pc) CO-to-H α flux ratio and find a universal de-correlation between molecular gas and young stars on GMC scales, allowing us to quantify the underlying evolutionary timeline. GMC lifetimes are short, typically $10\!-\!30\,{\rm Myr}$, and exhibit environmental variation, between and within galaxies. At kpc-scale molecular gas surface densities $\Sigma _{\rm H_2}\ge 8\,\rm {M_\odot}\,{{\rm pc}}^{-2}$, the GMC lifetime correlates with time-scales for galactic dynamical processes, whereas at $\Sigma _{\rm H_2}\le 8\,\rm {M_\odot}\,{{\rm pc}}^{-2}$ GMCs decouple from galactic dynamics and live for an internal dynamical time-scale. After a long inert phase without massive star formation traced by H α (75–90 per cent of the cloud lifetime), GMCs disperse within just $1\!-\!5\,{\rm Myr}$ once massive stars emerge. The dispersal is most likely due to early stellar feedback, causing GMCs to achieve integrated star formation efficiencies of 4–10 per cent. These results show that galactic star formation is governed by cloud-scale, environmentally dependent, dynamical processes driving rapid evolutionary cycling. GMCs and H ii regions are the fundamental units undergoing these lifecycles, with mean separations of $100\!-\!300\,{{\rm pc}}$ in star-forming discs. Future work should characterize the multiscale physics and mass flows driving these lifecycles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations286
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207