« Je suis un catholique » : la mémoire spirituelle de Flaubert chez les critiques chrétiens de l’entre-deux-guerres
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Considérée comme un moment incontournable dans l’histoire des études flaubertiennes en raison du débat qui oppose Marcel Proust à Albert Thibaudet, la période de l’entre-deux-guerres est également marquée par une polémique qui, issue des commémorations pour le centenaire de la naissance de Gustave Flaubert, reconduit et prolonge la discussion ouverte par André Gide et ses détracteurs sur les rapports entre littérature et religion. De Charles du Bos à Henri Guillemin, en passant par Albert Thibaudet et François Mauriac, les articles que nous avons retenus dans la présente étude forment un ensemble de textes se répondant les uns les autres et qui, au-delà de l’épineuse question de la finalité de l’ascèse flaubertienne, sont portés par la volonté singulière de refaçonner la mémoire spirituelle de Flaubert et de rendre à la postérité une nouvelle figure d’écrivain chrétien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".