MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994903648 · doi:10.1109/iemcon.2019.8936306

Sliding Mode for an All-Digital Control and Readout of MEMS Gyroscopes

2019· article· en· W2994903648 on OpenAlexaff
Sapna Srinivasan, Jinhao Lu, Ruolan Ye, Edmond Cretu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGyroscopeVibrating structure gyroscopeDemodulationDigital controlPhysicsController (irrigation)BitstreamComputer scienceSliding mode controlInertial measurement unitMicroelectromechanical systemsVibrationElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)AcousticsEngineeringOptoelectronicsTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile devices and sensor networks advances have sharply increased the demand for inertial MEMS sensors with a direct digital output. This paper reports on the first implementation of a MEMS-based gyroscope system with all-digital control and readout, using sliding mode and bitstream processing for both the driving and sensing modes. The in-plane vibrating MEMS gyroscope, sensitive to out-of-plane external angular rates, was designed in a custom 50um SOI technology. A band-pass sliding mode control (SMC), equivalent to a digital PLL control, was used for electrically driving one of the resonant modes at its resonant frequency, and track its drift (due to environment variations). Simulations indicate a fast capture time in response to step variations (high tracking speed of 11,486 rad/s2) and small continuous tracking errors, below 0.0083 %. A regular (low-pass) sliding mode control was used for the sensing mode, in order to cancel its vibration and thus improve its linearity. The feedback loop action was proven to attenuate the displacement in the sensing mode by more than 100 times. The resulting bitstream output (that generates in the SMC loop the high-frequency cancelling electrostatic forces) contains the relevant information about the Coriolis force, and a bitstream synchronous demodulation technique is used to reconstruct the input angular rate to be measured, with a reconstruction error of ±0.2 rad/s. The overall system enables an easy future implementation on a MEMS+FPGA of a high-performance angular rate sensing microsystem with digital output.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207