MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994908223 · doi:10.1109/iemcon.2019.8936187

Image Reconstruction by Chebyshev-Fourier Moments

2019· article· en· W2994908223 on OpenAlexaff
Haocheng Xu, Simon Liao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFourier transformChebyshev polynomialsChebyshev filterVelocity MomentsFourier analysisMathematicsMethod of moments (probability theory)Fourier seriesMathematical analysisAlgorithmPhysicsOpticsZernike polynomialsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this research, we have analyzed the Chebyshev-Fourier moments computing and found out that the errors are mainly caused by the computational issues of both radial and Fourier polynomials. To increase the accuracy of moments computing, we utilized the k × k numerical scheme in the computations of Chebyshev-Fourier moments and conducted the image reconstructions to verify our solution. The experimental results show that the performances of image reconstructions are highly satisfied. We have also performed image reconstructions from the different radial and Fourier orders of moments, and observed that the radial and Fourier orders of Chebyshev-Fourier moments preserve the information of circular and radial patterns, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207