MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994914735 · doi:10.1029/2019wr025313

Precipitation‐Runoff and Storage Dynamics in Watersheds Underlain by Till and Permeable Bedrock in Alberta's Rocky Mountains

2019· article· en· W2994914735 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Sheena A. Spencer, U. Silins, A. Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Resources Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsIntellijoint Surgical (Canada)University of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Agriculture and Forestry
KeywordsBedrockSurface runoffSnowmeltHydrology (agriculture)Water storageEnvironmental sciencePrecipitationGeologySnowGlacial periodGeomorphologyEcologyGeographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The complex mechanisms driving runoff dynamics in mountainous watersheds with thick glacial till and fractured bedrock are not well understood. We examined long‐ and short‐term precipitation‐runoff relationships and quantified subsurface storage in watersheds on the eastern slopes of Canada's Rocky Mountains to develop a conceptual understanding of runoff generation processes in this region. Fractured permeable bedrock (bedrock storage) and glacial till deposits (soil and till storage) collectively result in large dynamic storage (hydrologically active storage). The transition from multiyear dry to multiyear wet patterns increased specific discharge due to less bedrock storage opportunity but did not influence event‐scale rainfall‐runoff responses. Rather, event‐scale rainfall‐runoff responses were governed by snowmelt and soil and till storage capacity. While winter snowfall was an important predictor of annual runoff ratios, storage at the end of the previous fall also influenced runoff ratios. These complex subsurface dynamics and large storage capacities are important for understanding how mountainous watersheds with glacial till deposits may respond to disturbance or climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Resources ResearchSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207