MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994921769 · doi:10.28925/2524-0757.2016.2.9

INFOFMATIVE POSSIBILITIES OF CANADIAN IMMIGRATION POLICY STUDIES AT THE PRESENT STAGE

2016· article· en· W2994921769 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mariia Burtseva

Bibliographic record

VenueKyiv Historical Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismImmigrationMelting potRefugeeImmigration policyPolitical scienceDiversity (politics)RelocationPoliticsEthnic groupPolitical economyDevelopment economicsEconomic growthSociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immigration is very important in modern society. Different countries and their governments are faced with challenges caused by waves of immigration. Thousands of refugees and immigrants with different backgrounds are looking for their new home. As a result, a number of European states are going through a crisis of multiculturalism and tolerance. Therefore processes of the mass relocation need to be studied. Both practices of successful and unsuccessful immigration policy are important for researchers. The same is true of studying the policy of diversity and multiculturalism. Thus, there were failures of the politics of “Melting pot” in the former socialistic states. For instance, there was the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia with the idea of “Yugoslavian people”. Similarly, there was the idea of creating “Soviet people” in the USSR. In contrast, there was also successful immigration and multicultural policy. Besides, researchers should explore the regions where thousands and millions of immigrants and refugees have created a multi-ethnic society with different cultural, religious, linguistic traditions etc. But the diversity in these countries did not lead to conflicts within the society. Studying successful experience could give us an opportunity to understand the way of reaching tolerance in this multicultural world. One of the regions with successful experience is the Canadian Federation. Owing to the development of its own immigration policy in the 1960s, the Canada gave a new life to immigrants and refugees from different regions. In this paper the attention is paid to the review of the informative possibilities for researching Canada’s state policy in the fields of immigration and constructing of multicultural society in 1976-2012. It was made an attempt to classify the main groups of sources which help to research basic signs and features of the formation and implementation of the Canadian state policy in both fields. The article is mainly focused on the materials which are available on various Web-sites. The informative possibilities of materials for studying of Canadian policy towards immigrants and refugees are indicated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKyiv Historical StudiesSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207