Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian Astronomy Data Centre has developed a general purpose scientific data model and an API for accessing a scientific data warehouse. The Catalog API defines a general mechanism for exploring and querying scientific content using a constraint-based design. The API provides access to separate but related catalogs and allows for entries in one catalog to be related to (usually derived from) entries in another catalog. The purpose of the API is to provide storage-neutral and content-neutral access methods for scientific data. The API defines a network-accessible Jini service. We have developed the Canadian Virtual Observatory (CVO) as Jini services that implement the Catalog API. These catalogs store astronomical content: the pixel catalog provides uniform access to our many archival data holdings, the source catalog stores the results of image analysis, and the processing catalog stores metadata describing exactly how sources are extracted from pixel data. Entries in the source catalog are connected to entries in the processing and pixel catalogs from which they are derived.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it