MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994972044 · doi:10.7202/1066350ar

La détention provisoire et son incidence sur les droits fondamentaux des justiciables : étude comparative en droit franco-québécois

2019· article· fr· W2994972044 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Valérine Pinel

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de droit · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En France comme au Canada, une personne qui n’a pas encore fait l’objet d’une déclaration de culpabilité peut être placée en détention provisoire afin de s’assurer du bon fonctionnement de l’enquête et de la justice ou pour des raisons de sécurité. Le nombre de prévenus détenus et le temps passé en détention provisoire sont en augmentation dans les deux pays, ce qui entraîne une surpopulation carcérale importante. Dans son texte, l’auteure constate les incidences d’une telle mesure sur les droits des justiciables, notamment ceux qui relèvent du droit à un procès équitable. C’est en particulier à cause d’une anticipation de la question de la culpabilité et de la peine au stade de la décision sur le placement en détention provisoire que les personnes détenues provisoirement sont atteintes dans leurs droits. Or ces différentes répercussions ne touchent pas toujours de manière identique tous les justiciables, ce qui, en sus, nuit à leur droit à l’égalité devant la loi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers de droitSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207