Les commémorations profanées dans Les Marchands de gloire de Pagnol-Nivoix et Au revoir là-haut de Pierre Lemaitre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article compare le roman de Pierre LemaitreAu revoir là-hautpublié en 2013 et la pièce de théâtre de Marcel Pagnol et de Paul NivoixLes Marchands de gloiremontée au Théâtre de la Madeleine en 1925. Ces deux fictions mettent en scène le contexte de l’immédiat après-guerre et traitent de l’opportunisme des survivants qui exploitent la mémoire des morts. Les deux ouvrages contribuent à asseoir les représentations satiriques des années 1920 d’une France déboussolée par la mise à mal de l’idéal héroïque. Romancier et dramaturges prennent un parti antimilitariste et s’intéressent à la perte d’identité des vétérans et des soldats enterrés. Ils donnent à voir le renversement de la société qui privilégie les hommes de l’arrière aux survivants. Ces textes proposent une satire de l’hypocrisie commémorative de la France des monuments. Les écrivains mettent ainsi au tombeau les illusions héroïques de la victoire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".