« Te presentant sans nulle difference, par vraye amour, la clef de tout mon cueur ». L’offrande du cœur dans les entrées royales françaises à la Renaissance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parmi les nombreuses manifestations de l’amour politique mis en scène lors des entrées royales aux xv e et xvi e siècles, figure le motif de l’offrande du cœur qui rend visible l’idée abstraite de la caritas comme sentiment, lien réciproque et don. Motif récurrent jusqu’au règne d’Henri IV, il se déploie au début de l’entrée, moment crucial alors que s’établissent rituellement la relation pacifique et l’engagement réciproque entre la ville et le roi. Il apparaît associé à une conception du pouvoir qui sous-tend la réciprocité de l’autorité, partagée entre les villes, les États et la royauté et il aurait sans doute disparu des spectacles des entrées si ce n’était du contexte des guerres de Religion permettant à certaines communautés d’exprimer à leur souverain leurs attentes et de renouer le dialogue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".