MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995023701 · doi:10.7238/dd.v0i7.3164

França: una República que dubta ... i abdica

2019· article· ca· W2995023701 on OpenAlexaff
Phryné Pigenet, Michel Pigenet

Bibliographic record

VenueDictatorships & Democracies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageca
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsQuest University Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceContext (archaeology)ArtHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El Front Popular, fundat com a reacció a l’agressivitat amenaçadora dels contraris a Gueuse, va relligar les aspiracions cap a una república democràtica i social. La irrupció inesperada i victoriosa dels treballadors va soscavar la dimensió interclasse de l'Estat sense agitar el seu centre de poder, el llit calent d'una forma de conservadorisme confós amb l'estabilitat. Això era especialment evident en qüestions de diplomàcia i finances, que van ser la font de desafiament i venjança entre 1938 i 1940, en un context de tensió internacional. Amb una gran decepció, tot va portar al règim a desviar-se tant dels seus compromisos com dels seus principis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDictatorships & DemocraciesSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207