Le Dossier : La transsystémie. Pour une approche rénovée de la conception et de l’enseignement du droit, Actes du colloque de Clermont-Ferrand des 12 et 13 décembre 2016, textes réunis par J-F. Riffard et S. Castillo-Wyszogrodzka, La Revue du Centre Michel de l'Hospital [ édition électronique ], E. Raschel (dir.), 2019, n° 17, pp. 8-69
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction, Jean-Francois RIFFARD, Professeur de droit prive et de sciences criminelles, Universite Clermont Auvergne, Sylwia CASTILLO-WYSZOGRODZKA, Maitre de conferences en droit prive et en sciences criminelles, Universite Clermont Auvergne ; L’existence d’une culture juridique europeenne, entre doutes et intuitions, Sandrine TISSEYRE, Professeur de droit prive et de sciences criminelles, Universite Toulouse 1 Capitole ; Upside down : transsystemie et droit compare, retour sur quelques aspects de methodologie, Jean-Francois RIFFARD, Professeur de droit prive et de sciences criminelles, Universite Clermont Auvergne ; La transsystemie et le droit compare : complementarite ou antagonisme ?, Sylwia CASTILLO-WYSZOGRODZKA, Maitre de conferences en droit prive et en sciences criminelles, Universite Clermont Auvergne ; Structure et methode de la pedagogie transsystemique, Rosalie JUKIER, Professeure titulaire a la Faculte de droit de l’Universite McGill ; L’approche transsystemique et l’enseignement du droit en ecole de commerce, Hugues BOUTHINON-DUMAS, Professeur dans le departement Droit et environnement de l’entreprise, ESSEC Business School, Vice-president de l’Association Francaise Droit & Management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it