MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995060707 · doi:10.1109/tie.2019.2959482

Globally Fixed-Time High-Order Sliding Mode Control for New Sliding Mode Systems Subject to Mismatched Terms and Its Application

2019· article· en· W2995060707 on OpenAlexafffund
Shang Shi, Jason Gu, Shengyuan Xu, Huifang Min

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Sliding mode controlSettling timeController (irrigation)Mode (computer interface)Lyapunov functionVariable structure controlComputer scienceMathematicsEngineeringControl engineeringNonlinear systemControl (management)PhysicsStep response

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-order sliding mode (HOSM) control is used for output regulation of uncertain systems with known relative degree. Yet, the traditional HOSM algorithm can only achieve finite-time output regulation for standard integrator sliding mode systems, whose settling time depends on system initial conditions. In this article, first, we extend the standard sliding mode system to a new sliding mode system subject to mismatched terms. The use of the new sliding mode system can reduce the uncertainties in input channel and/or relax the well-defined relative degree assumption. Second, the conventional constant upper bounds assumption is relaxed to time-varying functions, which enables us to obtain a globally convergent controller. Finally, for the new sliding mode system under the new global assumption, we propose a novel fixed-time HOSM controller whose settling time can be predefined and is free of system initial conditions. In addition, strict Lyapunov analysis is provided to show that the new sliding mode system under the proposed controller and the new global assumption is globally fixed-time stable. An application to buck converter is given to show the effectiveness of the proposed controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207