Experimental measurement of monotonic and cyclic lateral resistance of risers and pipelines in Gulf of Mexico clays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The location near the touchdown zone of a steel catenary riser at the seabed is a primary “hot spot” for fatigue assessment, with seabed stiffness having a major influence on the predicted fatigue life. This paper presents the results of laboratory model tests in the lateral direction with the motivation to appropriately capture the fundamental mechanism of soil interaction with the pipeline or riser in the lateral direction. The objectives of this study are to evaluate (i) the fundamental mechanism of soil interaction with the pipeline or riser in the lateral direction subjected to monotonic and cyclic loading, (ii) the evolution of lateral resistance with different (small to large) displacement amplitudes, (iii) the degradation of lateral resistance while increasing the number of cycles, and (iv) the recovery of the soil strength with time. The primary findings from the tests are that (i) the lateral resistance on the riser–pipeline drops sharply after trench formation, (ii) the lateral resistance across the trench approaches zero and reaches a steady state at a large number of cycles, (iii) the shape of trenches depends on the lateral displacement amplitude and the initial penetration depth, and (iv) some regain in strength occurs after a period for consolidation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".