MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995094214 · doi:10.1090/tran/8279

Gelfand transforms and boundary representations of complete Nevanlinna–Pick quotients

2020· preprint· en· W2995094214 on OpenAlexafffund
Raphaël Clouâtre, Edward J. Timko

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHolomorphic and Operator Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences
KeywordsMathematicsPure mathematicsQuotientConjectureCommutative propertyMultiplier (economics)Multiplication (music)Space (punctuation)Algebra over a fieldCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objects under study are quotients of multiplier algebras of certain complete Nevanlinna–Pick spaces, examples of which include the Drury–Arveson space on the ball and the Dirichlet space on the disc. We are particularly interested in the non-commutative Choquet boundaries for these quotients. Arveson’s notion of hyperrigidity is shown to be detectable through the essential normality of some natural multiplication operators, thus extending previously known results on the Arveson–Douglas conjecture. We also highlight how the non-commutative Choquet boundaries of these quotients are intertwined with their Gelfand transforms being completely isometric. Finally, we isolate analytic and topological conditions on the so-called supports of the underlying ideals that clarify the nature of the non-commutative Choquet boundaries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicHolomorphic and Operator TheoryFrench-language works237,207