MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995108027 · doi:10.18280/ria.330503

An Automobile Noise Prediction Model Based on Extension Data Mining Algorithm

2019· article· en· W2995108027 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hui Lü, Tichun Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Noise and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceEntropy (arrow of time)Noise (video)Data miningDecision treeAutomotive industryArtificial intelligencePrinciple of maximum entropyAutocorrelationLogistic regressionExtension (predicate logic)AlgorithmMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)EngineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, the prediction of automobile noise has attracted much attention from the academia. This paper aims to develop an automobile noise prediction model based on basic vehicle parameters and vehicle speed, rather than the features calculated from noise data. First, the extension data mining (EDM) was adopted to preprocess the original data, select the features and establish the matter-element models of automobile noise. Then, the extremum entropy method (EEM), an improved information entropy method, was selected to determine the weight of each feature for the calculation of comprehensive correlation function. To verify its effectiveness of the proposed model, our model was applied to experiments on an automobile noise dataset, in comparison with logistic regression and decision tree. The results show that our model outperformed the contrastive methods in prediction accuracy, eliminating the need to set hyper-parameters in advance. The research findings provide a new method to predict automobile noise based on basic vehicle parameters and vehicle speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicVehicle Noise and Vibration ControlFrench-language works237,207