Dextran Functionalization of Semiconducting Polymer Dots and Conjugation with Tetrameric Antibody Complexes for Bioanalysis and Imaging
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Brightly fluorescent semiconducting polymer dots (Pdots) are emerging as very useful probes for bioanalysis and imaging. Unfortunately, Pdot materials often suffer from limitations such as poor colloidal and physical stability, nonspecific adsorption, and relatively few reported surface chemistries and bioconjugate chemistries. To help address these limitations, we have developed dextran-functionalized Pdots (Dex-Pdots). This functionalization improves particle stability over a range of pH and at high ionic strength, hinders surface-induced unfolding, and enables the preparation of immunoconjugates via tetrameric antibody complexes (TAC). The utility of TAC-conjugated Dex-Pdots is demonstrated through a proof-of-concept fluorescence-linked immunosorbent assay (FLISA) for human erythropoietin (EPO), and through immunolabeling of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive SK-BR3 breast cancer cells. The conjugates exhibited less nonspecific binding and greater specific binding than Pdots without dextran functionalization. Overall, dextran functionalization is a highly promising surface chemistry for biological applications of Pdots.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it