MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995140089 · doi:10.1109/iemcon.2019.8936257

IoT Gas and Temperature Monitoring Interface of a Low Temperature Pyrolysis Reactor for the Production of Biochar

2019· article· en· W2995140089 on OpenAlexaff
Nestor Luis Brito Naveda, Julie Youjin Jung, A. M. Davydov, Pavandeep Singh Dhillon, Yun Hua Hung, Mark Lee, Jasmine Radu, Oakley Bach-Raabe, Connor Michael Thomas Hayden

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT-based Control Systems
Canadian institutionsLangara College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBiocharEvent (particle physics)Interface (matter)PyrolysisProcess engineeringArduinoEnvironmental scienceReal-time computingEmbedded systemOperating systemWaste managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Langara College Biochar Project consists on the use of a small pyrolysis reactor to convert a variety of biomass compounds into biochar. The current reactor lacks a monitoring interface to keep track of the different gas concentrations and the temperature of the kiln. This project aims to create a device that: communicates gas concentrations and temperatures from the pyrolytic reaction to a website; in the case of an emergency event, sends SMS alerts to the operator, and enables an actuator to shut off the reaction; and finally, stores data locally. The device used for data acquisition and manipulation was an Arduino Mega 2560, fitted with a Wi-Fi shield for the communications and data storage. Sensor wise, the Grove Multichannel Gas Sensor, DHT22, and TMP36, were employed for the measurement of gas concentrations, humidity, and temperature, respectively. ThingSpeak and IFTTT were used for the monitoring and alert system. The scope of this project was to provide a starting point to such a device by employing inexpensive components and laying out most of the software. As a consequence, our results were affected by cross-sensitivity between gas sensors. Regardless, the device is capable of displaying trend-lines for the concentration, sending them to a remote server, storing the data locally, and sending alerts when an emergency event occurs. Future iterations should employ a fully featured website and more precise sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT-based Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207