MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995155898 · doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab63eb

The Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array Sky Survey (VLASS). Science Case and Survey Design

2020· article· en· W2995155898 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Manitoba
FundersDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversidad de GuanajuatoNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekJet Propulsion LaboratoryDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationOffice of Diversity and InclusionCalifornia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of MinnesotaNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryNational Science Foundation
KeywordsJanskySkyRadio astronomyBandwidth (computing)Angular resolution (graph drawing)Cover (algebra)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array Sky Survey (VLASS). Science Case and Survey Design, Lacy, M., Baum, S. A., Chandler, C. J., Chatterjee, S., Clarke, T. E., Deustua, S., English, J., Farnes, J., Gaensler, B. M., Gugliucci, N., Hallinan, G., Kent, B. R., Kimball, A., Law, C. J., Lazio, T. J. W., Marvil, J., Mao, S. A., Medlin, D., Mooley, K., Murphy, E. J., Myers, S., Osten, R., Richards, G. T., Rosolowsky, E., Rudnick, L., Schinzel, F., Sivakoff, G. R., Sjouwerman, L. O., Taylor, R., White, R. L., Wrobel, J., Andernach, H., Beasley, A. J., Berger, E., Bhatnager, S., Birkinshaw, M., Bower, G. C., Brandt, W. N., Brown, S., Burke-Spolaor, S., Butler, B. J., Comerford, J., Demorest, P. B., Fu, H., Giacintucci, S., Golap, K., Güth, T., Hales, C. A., Hiriart, R., Hodge, J., Horesh, A., Ivezić, Ž., Jarvis, M. J., Kamble, A., Kassim, N., Liu, X., Loinard, L., Lyons, D. K., Masters, J., Mezcua, M., Moellenbrock, G. A., Mroczkowski, T., Nyland, K., O’Dea, C. P., O’Sullivan, S. P., Peters, W. M., Radford, K., Rao, U., Robnett, J., Salcido, J., Shen, Y., Sobotka, A., Witz, S., Vaccari, M., Weeren, R. J. van, Vargas, A., Williams, P. K. G., Yoon, I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.033
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.089
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0330.089
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations648
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Astronomical Society of the PacificSame topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207