MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995177052 · doi:10.1109/lnet.2019.2959733

Admission Control and Network Slicing for Multi-Numerology 5G Wireless Networks

2019· article· en· W2995177052 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Networking Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche
KeywordsSlicingComputer scienceBlocking (statistics)Computer networkMobile broadbandWireless networkBandwidth (computing)Constraint (computer-aided design)Admission controlLatency (audio)Broadband networksWirelessWireless broadbandBroadbandDistributed computingQuality of serviceTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter studies the admission control and network slicing design for 5G New Radio (5G-NR) systems in which the total bandwidth is sliced to support the enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB) and ultra reliable and low latency communication (URLLC) services. We allow traffic from the eMBB bandwidth part to be overflowed to the URLLC bandwidth part in a controlled manner. We develop a mathematical framework to analyze the blocking probabilities of both eMBB and URLLC services based on which the network slicing and admission control is jointly optimized to minimize the blocking probability of the eMBB traffic subject to the blocking probability constraint for the URLLC traffic. An efficient iterative algorithm is proposed to deal with the underlying problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it