MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995203388 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2019.8925763

Nano-particle mass sensing using phononic pillars

2019· article· en· W2995203388 on OpenAlexaff
Jérémy Bonhomme, Mourad Oudich, Djafari-Rouhani Bahram, F. Sarry, Pennec Yann, Bernard Bonello, D. Beyssen, Paul G. Charette

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPillarStackingPerturbation (astronomy)HomogeneousMaterials scienceTungstenOptoelectronicsPhysicsComputational physicsStatistical physicsStructural engineeringEngineeringQuantum mechanicsNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we investigate the sensitivity of a pillar based metasurface in order to understand the behavior of the system in real tests conditions where the mass perturbation will not be homogeneous on all the system. The structure we study is composed in stacking alternate layers of Silica and Tungsten and presents a torsional resonant mode which presents a high quality factor and a high mass sensitivity, in a case of a homogeneous perturbation. In a case of a non-homogeneous mass-perturbation over the pillars, each pillar gives a contribution to the signal perturbation under the form of a shifted peak. These results show that each pillar gives a contribution to the output signal and that the high quality factor of the structure allows to distinguishing the different perturbations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207