MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995205965 · doi:10.1177/1081286519884351

A circular Eshelby inclusion interacting with a non-parabolic open inhomogeneity with internal uniform anti-plane stresses

2019· article· en· W2995205965 on OpenAlexafffund
Xu Wang, Ping Yang, Peter Schiavone

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics and Mechanics of Solids · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Material Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsConformal mapInclusion (mineral)Internal stressMatrix (chemical analysis)Stress fieldStress (linguistics)Plane (geometry)GeometryField (mathematics)MathematicsMathematical analysisMaterials sciencePhysicsComposite materialFinite element methodPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using conformal mapping techniques and analytic continuation, we prove that when subjected to anti-plane elastic deformations, a non-parabolic open inhomogeneity continues to admit an internal uniform stress field when a circular Eshelby inclusion is placed in its vicinity and the surrounding matrix is subjected to uniform remote stresses. Explicit expressions for the non-uniform stress distributions in the matrix and in the circular Eshelby inclusion are obtained. The internal uniform stress field is independent of the shape of the inhomogeneity and the presence of the circular Eshelby inclusion, whereas the existence of the circular Eshelby inclusion exerts a significant influence on the shape of the non-parabolic open inhomogeneity as well as on the non-uniform stress distributions in the matrix and in the circular Eshelby inclusion itself.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics and Mechanics of SolidsSame topicComposite Material MechanicsFrench-language works237,207