MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995332117 · doi:10.1002/9781394260591.ch23

Practicing Psychology in Correctional Settings

2013· other· en· W2995332117 on OpenAlex
Paul Gendreau, Claire Goggin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCounseling Practices and Supervision
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas UniversityUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPenologyRecidivismImprisonmentPrisonCriminologyDeterrence (psychology)PsychologyCriminal behaviourPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this chapter, the authors focus on prison settings, where most psychologists in the correctional arena are employed. They begin by providing a brief history of prisons followed by a summary of the three major theories of the effects of imprisonment on offender behavior. The three most prominent theories of the effects of imprisonment in terms of their chronological development are deterrence theory, The “schools of crime” theory and deep-freeze theory. Then the authors examine these theories in the light of what are considered to be two of the most pressing demands in penology: management of prisons in a safe and humane fashion and the development of prison treatment programs in order to reduce recidivism and thereby enhance public protection. In comparison to the foregoing, the emerging database on the prediction and treatment of criminal behavior offers specific guidelines regarding the management of prisons and the reduction of recidivism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2710.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCounseling Practices and SupervisionFrench-language works237,207