MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995359462 · doi:10.4000/edc.9014

Da Sylva Lyne, Cuxac Pascal : Analyse et exploitation des bibliothèques numériques

2019· article· fr· W2995359462 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Florence Thiault

Bibliographic record

VenueEtudes de communication/Études de communication · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPascal (unit)ArtSuiteLibrary sciencePhysicsGeographyComputer scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce numéro spécial de la Revue des sciences et technologies de l’information (RSTI) coordonné par Lyne Da Sylva enseignante à l’EBSI (École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l’information, Montréal Canada) et Pascal Cuxac ingénieur de recherche à l’INIST-CNRS fait suite au colloque « Analyser la science : les bibliothèques numériques comme objet de recherche » qui a eu lieu à Montréal dans le cadre du 85e congrès de l’ACFAS (Association francophone pour le savoir). À la croisée des enjeux...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0110.020
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.245
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.129 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEtudes de communication/Études de communicationSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207