Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce contenu est une compilation d'articles de l'encyclopedie libre Wikipedia. Le scandale des commandites est une affaire politique canadienne relative a l'usage de fonds publics pour financer une operation de relations publiques visant a contrecarrer les actions du Parti quebecois en faveur de la souverainete du Quebec, province qu'il gouverne. Dans la perspective de sensibiliser l'opinion publique quebecoise sur les actions positives du gouvernement federal canadien dans la province du Quebec, d'importants contrats ont ete signes avec des agences publicitaires. Mais l'usage des sommes allouees, l'efficacite de la campagne et le montant des contrats n'ont pas fait l'objet d'evaluations et de controles stricts. L'implication du Parti liberal du Canada, au pouvoir de 1993 a 2006, est importante dans cette affaire qui se deroula de 1997 a 2003. Les fonds publics investis ont ete evalues en 2005 a 332 millions CAD. Paul Martin, Premier ministre du Canada, a cree en 2004 la Commission Gomery, chargee de faire la lumiere sur ce scandale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.057 | 0.021 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".