MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995421993 · doi:10.1101/2019.12.20.884916

Cell type prioritization in single-cell data

2019· preprint· en· W2995421993 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael A. Skinnider, Jordan W. Squair, Claudia Kathe, Mark A. Anderson, Matthieu Gautier, Kaya J.E. Matson, Marco Milano, Quentin Barraud, Aaron A. Phillips, Leonard J. Foster, Gioele La Manno, Ariel J. Levine, Grégoire Courtine

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of CalgaryLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeAlberta InnovatesKillam TrustsNational Institutes of HealthSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungGenome British ColumbiaWestern Canada Research GridFondation Brain CanadaNational Science FoundationCompute CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGenome Canada
KeywordsCompendiumComputer sciencePrioritizationCellCell typeChromatinNeuroscienceArtificial intelligenceComputational biologyBiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a machine-learning method to prioritize the cell types most responsive to biological perturbations within high-dimensional single-cell data. We validate our method, Augur ( https://github.com/neurorestore/Augur ), on a compendium of single-cell RNA-seq, chromatin accessibility, and imaging transcriptomics datasets. We apply Augur to expose the neural circuits that enable walking after paralysis in response to spinal cord neurostimulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207