MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995422874 · doi:10.1142/s0219265919500063

Approximation Algorithm for the Broadcast Time in <i>k</i>-Path Graph

2019· article· en· W2995422874 on OpenAlexaff
Puspal Bhabak, Hovhannes A. Harutyunyan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Interconnection Networks · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVertex (graph theory)Time complexityGraphPath (computing)Broadcasting (networking)Tree (set theory)AlgorithmApproximation algorithmTheoretical computer scienceCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsMathematicsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Broadcasting is an information dissemination problem in a connected network in which one node, called the originator, must distribute a message to all other nodes by placing a series of calls along the communication lines of the network. In every unit of time, the informed nodes aid the originator in distributing the message. Finding the broadcast time of any vertex in an arbitrary graph is NP-complete. The polynomial time solvability is shown only for certain graphs like trees, unicyclic graphs, tree of cycles, necklace graphs, fully connected trees and tree of cliques. In this paper we study the broadcast problem in k-path graphs. For any originator of the k-path graph we present a (4 – ϵ)-approximation algorithm in the worst case. The algorithm gives a better approximation ratio for some large classes of k-path graphs. Moreover, our algorithm generates the optimal broadcast time for some cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Interconnection NetworksSame topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207