MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995490816

The Zone of Proximal Development as a basis for instruction in vocational and technical education, training

2002· article· en· W2995490816 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abu Bockarie

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian vocational journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational and Psychological Assessments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZone of proximal developmentApprenticeshipVocational educationMathematics educationCognitive apprenticeshipPsychologyPedagogy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of a Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) as a way for psychologists and educators to think about children's development and the way they learn and develop problem-solving abilities necessary for the performance of a range of developmentally-related tasks was created by Vygotsky. In this article, the focus is on the ways in which Vygotsky's ZPD concept might provide a basis for learning and instruction in adult vocational and technical education and training. It suggests that the ZPD concept has tremendous potential for use as a basis of instruction in cognitive apprenticeship and other forms of vocational and technical education and offers Lave and Wenger's labels for roles and status of apprentice development, underpinned by four ZPD figures, as useful representations of Vygotsky's work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.019
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian vocational journalSame topicEducational and Psychological AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207