L’Europe en transition. Impact sur l’occupation et la santé. Compte-rendu du congrès 2019 d’Occupational Science Europe (OSE), août 2019, Amsterdam, Pays-Bas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans ce compte rendu du congrès 2019 d’Occupational Science Europe (OSE), les auteur·e·s expliquent qu’ils et elles y ont présenté la création de la Société Francophone de Recherche sur les Occupations (SFRO). Ils et elles évoquent quelques thématiques qui ont été abordées lors de ce congrès, dont la question de la langue des publications en sciences de l’occupation, mais aussi la place de perspectives collaboratives, issues notamment du Sud. D’autres thèmes très variés, tels que les effets dévastateurs de la dévaluation sociale ou encore la création d’un programme doctoral en sciences de l’occupation centré sur le jeu libre ont également fait l’objet de présentations. Finalement, la première conférence mondiale des sciences de l’occupation, organisée par l’International Society of Occupational Scientists (ISOS), a été annoncée : elle aura lieu à Vancouver du 25 au 28 août 2021.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".