MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995557695 · doi:10.1063/5.0052126

Confronting interatomic force measurements

2021· preprint· en· W2995557695 on OpenAlexafffund
Omur E. Dagdeviren

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOscillation (cell signaling)AmplitudeInteratomic potentialPhysicsCantileverClassical mechanicsChemistryMolecular dynamicsMaterials scienceOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The quantitative interatomic force measurements open a new pathway to materials characterization, surface science, and chemistry by elucidating the tip-sample interaction forces. Atomic force microscopy is the ideal platform to gauge interatomic forces between the tip and the sample. For such quantitative measurements, either the oscillation frequency or the oscillation amplitude and the phase of a vibrating cantilever are recorded as a function of the tip-sample separation. These experimental quantities are subsequently converted into the tip-sample interaction force, which can be compared with interatomic force laws to reveal the governing physical phenomena. Recently, it has been shown that the most commonly applied mathematical conversion techniques may suffer a significant deviation from the actual tip-sample interaction forces. To avoid the assessment of unphysical interatomic forces, the use of either very small (i.e., a few picometers) or very large oscillation amplitudes (i.e., a few nanometers) has been proposed. However, the use of marginal oscillation amplitudes gives rise to another problem as it lacks the feasibility due to the adverse signal-to-noise ratios. Here, we show a new mathematical conversion principle that confronts interatomic force measurements while preserving the oscillation amplitude within the experimentally achievable and favorable limits, i.e., tens of picometers. Our theoretical calculations and complementary experimental results demonstrate that the proposed technique has three major advantages over existing methodologies: (I) eliminating mathematical instabilities of the reconstruction of tip-sample interaction force, (II) enabling accurate conversion deep into the repulsive regime of tip-sample interaction force, and (III) being robust to the uncertainty of the oscillation amplitude and the measurement noise. Due to these advantages, we anticipate that our methodology will be the nucleus of a reliable evaluation of material properties with a more accurate measurement of tip-sample interaction forces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207